Insight. Applied.
A statistical note published in the BMJ (formally the British Medical Journal) reminds us that
…trials that do not show a significant difference between the treatments being compared are often called "negative." This term wrongly implies that the study has shown that there is no difference, whereas usually all that has been shown is an absence of evidence of a difference. These are quite different statements.
The American Statistical Association has taken the unprecedented step of issuing guidance on the use of p-values. Its statement was prompted by concerns that misuse of p-values was driving bad science.
Basic and Applied Social Psychology has refused to accept papers containing p-values.
A p-value is “informally” defined in the statement as
…the probability under a specified statistical model that a statistical summary of the data (for example, the sample mean difference between two compared groups) would be equal to or more extreme than its observed value.
Doesn’t really help much, but you have to applaud the attempt. After all, even scientists don’t really understand p-values.