Decision Mechanics

Insight. Applied.

Human brains hate probability

By

There was a great article published last month discussing risk communication.

Statistician Regina Nuzzo is quoted as saying

Human brains hate probability, they hate ambiguity, they hate the uncertainty. We’re just not wired to deal with this sort of thing very well.

Science journalist Tara Haelle explains that it’s difficult to separate reporting from influence. She notes that covering polls about willingness to take a vaccine set behavioural norms.

The more people question vaccines, the more people question vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy is contagious.

So, in summary, we find it difficult to think about probabilities, but are easily lead by opinion. This is why it’s increasingly essential for everyone to develop a degree of statistical literacy. With so much data flying around, and so many people commandeering it to promote their own view, we all need to be able to come to our own informed conclusions.

Photo by Naser Tamimi on Unsplash

Statistical intuition

By

splash

The Monty Hall problem is a probability puzzle based on an old US game show. You are shown three doors. One contains a car, while the other two contains goats. The game show host invites you to pick a door. He then opens one of the doors containing a goat and asks, "Do you want to stick with your original selection or switch to the remaining door?"

What should you do…assuming that you don’t wish to own a goat?

I’ll take all the fun out of it. You should switch. It doubles your chances of getting the car.

Convinced? Probably not. Even when presented with the solution, many people struggle to accept it. It’s not particularly intuitive.

Martin Johnsson recently discussed this on his blog. He used paper simulation, computer modelling and mathematics to try and satisfy himself of the wisdom of switching. He concluded

…I’m not sure I have convinced myself of the solution to the generalised problem yet.

Reasoning about probabilities is hard. It’s very easy to be led astray by our "gut". As the eminent statistician Sir David Spiegelhalter has noted

…when asked a basic school question using probability, I have to […] try it a few different ways, and finally announce what I hope is the correct answer.

This dereliction of our instincts means that it’s essential to draw on the formal methods of statistics and Monte Carlo simulation when making important decisions.

Photo by Sergiu Vălenaș on Unsplash

Sharks are definitely scarier than mosquitos

By

Bill Gates retweeted a World Health Organization infographic showing that mosquitos kill vastly more people than sharks every year—on the order of 100,000 times more.

In his tweet Bill captioned the infographic with, "Why I would rather encounter a shark in the wild rather than a mosquito." Presumably he’s referring to man-eating sharks.

This was an informal comment designed to highlight the misery caused by malaria—a cause that is at the centre of Bill’s philanthropy. Clearly it wasn’t supposed to be a serious risk assessment.

But it illustrates how confusing conditional probabilities are, and how easy it is to make invalid statistic inferences.

The data in the infographic refer to the probability that, given you are dead, you were killed by a shark or a mosquito. Chances are that it was a mosquito—not a shark. That seems intuitive.

Technically, we can denote this as

$P(shark|death) << P(mosquito|death)$

I’m not convinced by Bill’s implication that it’s better to encounter a shark than a mosquito. I grew up after "Jaws" was released. Intuitively, surely sharks are much more dangerous, right?

The risk posed by meeting either of these creatures is the probability of being killed given you met them. If we encountered man-eating sharks as often as we encounter mosquitos we’d be getting munched on constantly.

Sharks are definitely scarier. We can represent this more formally as

$P(death|shark) >> P(death|mosquito)$

It’s important that we distinguish between $P(mosquito|death)$ and $P(death|mosquito)$ when drawing inferences.

Fortunately man-eating sharks live in the ocean and I don’t. Given that, I’m willing to sign up for more killer sharks and less mosquitos.